Questionnaire A 1 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: ConferenceMember Individual: ?i Types: readPaper some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "readPaper" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(readPaper some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "ConferenceMember"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 2 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: invites_co-reviewers some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "invites_co-reviewers" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(invites_co-reviewers some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 3 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Paper Individual: ?i Types: Title some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "Title" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(Title some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Paper"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 4 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Conference_volume Individual: ?i Types: has_contributions some Regular_contribution Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "has_contributions" to at least one object of the class "Regular_contribution". Question: Is this class "(has_contributions some Regular_contribution)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Conference_volume"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 5 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: activity Individual: ?i Types: is_monitored_by some Senior_Program_Committee_member Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "is_monitored_by" to at least one object of the class "Senior_Program_Committee_member". Question: Is this class "(is_monitored_by some Senior_Program_Committee_member)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "activity"? 6 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: need some LCD_projector Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "need" to at least one object of the class "LCD_projector". Question: Is this class "(need some LCD_projector)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 7 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: produces some CD-ROM Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "produces" to at least one object of the class "CD-ROM". Question: Is this class "(produces some CD-ROM)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 8 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: send some Publication Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "send" to at least one object of the class "Publication". Question: Is this class "(send some Publication)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 9 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: ProgramCommitteeMember Individual: ?i Types: writeReview some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "writeReview" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(writeReview some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "ProgramCommitteeMember"? 10 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Topic Individual: ?i Types: is_a_topis_of_conference_parts some Tutorial Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "is_a_topis_of_conference_parts" to at least one object of the class "Tutorial". Question: Is this class "(is_a_topis_of_conference_parts some Tutorial)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Topic"? 11 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: ContractProcedureSpecifications Individual: ?i Types: urgencyType value CompetitiveDialogue Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "urgencyType" to the object "CompetitiveDialogue". Question: Is this class "(urgencyType value CompetitiveDialogue)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "ContractProcedureSpecifications"? 12 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Tender Individual: ?i Types: kind value MilitaryAndCivilDASServices Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "kind" to the object "MilitaryAndCivilDASServices". Question: Is this class "(kind value MilitaryAndCivilDASServices)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Tender"? 13 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: area Individual: ?i Types: isPredecessorOf value Cook_Islands_the Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "isPredecessorOf" to the object "Cook_Islands_the". Question: Is this class "(isPredecessorOf value Cook_Islands_the)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "area"? 14 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: beatifiedPlace some WineRegion Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "beatifiedPlace" to at least one object of the class "WineRegion". Question: Is this class "(beatifiedPlace some WineRegion)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 15 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Agent Individual: ?i Types: hasAgentType value http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/agentType#sof Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasAgentType" to the object "sof". Question: Is this class "(hasAgentType value sof)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Agent"? 16 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: BusinessEntity Individual: ?i Types: mainActivity value GeneralServices Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "mainActivity" to the object "GeneralServices". Question: Is this class "(mainActivity value GeneralServices)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "BusinessEntity"? 17 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Product Individual: ?i Types: payload value 0to100KMH Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "payload" to the object "0to100KMH". Question: Is this class "(payload value 0to100KMH)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Product"? 18 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Interval Individual: ?i Types: intervalContains some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "intervalContains" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(intervalContains some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Interval"? 19 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Service Individual: ?i Types: produces some InstallAction Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "produces" to at least one object of the class "InstallAction". Question: Is this class "(produces some InstallAction)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Service"? 20 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Village Individual: ?i Types: headChef some BaseballPlayer Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "headChef" to at least one object of the class "BaseballPlayer". Question: Is this class "(headChef some BaseballPlayer)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Village"?