Questionnaire B 1 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: PhaseOfConferencePreparation Individual: ?i Types: hasPhaseStatus some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasPhaseStatus" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(hasPhaseStatus some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "PhaseOfConferencePreparation"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 2 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Item Individual: ?i Types: is_writen_by some Plenary_lecture_speaker Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "is_writen_by" to at least one object of the class "Plenary_lecture_speaker". Question: Is this class "(is_writen_by some Plenary_lecture_speaker)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Item"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 3 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Conference Individual: ?i Types: has_a_commtitee some Organizing_committee Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "has_a_commtitee" to at least one object of the class "Organizing_committee". Question: Is this class "(has_a_commtitee some Organizing_committee)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Conference"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not) 4 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Conference Individual: ?i Types: City_of_conference some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "City_of_conference" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(City_of_conference some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Conference"? 5 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: submit some Paper Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "submit" to at least one object of the class "Paper". Question: Is this class "(submit some Paper)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 6 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Place Individual: ?i Types: is_equipped_by some Audiovisual_equipment Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "is_equipped_by" to at least one object of the class "Audiovisual_equipment". Question: Is this class "(is_equipped_by some Audiovisual_equipment)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Place"? 7 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Session Individual: ?i Types: hasChair some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasChair" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(hasChair some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Session"? 8 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: finalizePaperAssignment some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "finalizePaperAssignment" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(finalizePaperAssignment some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 9 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: ConferenceEvent Individual: ?i Types: hasCall some CallForReviews Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasCall" to at least one object of the class "CallForReviews". Question: Is this class "(hasCall some CallForReviews)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "ConferenceEvent"? 10 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: ContractProcedureSpecifications Individual: ?i Types: procedureType value CompetitiveDialogue Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "procedureType" to the object "CompetitiveDialogue". Question: Is this class "(procedureType value CompetitiveDialogue)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "ContractProcedureSpecifications"? 11 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: area Individual: ?i Types: isAdministeredBy value Dominica Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "isAdministeredBy" to the object "Dominica". Question: Is this class "(isAdministeredBy value Dominica)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "area"? 12 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Event-Involving-Movement Individual: ?i Types: sender-of-information some PhD-Student Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "sender-of-information" to at least one object of the class "PhD-Student". Question: Is this class "(sender-of-information some PhD-Student)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Event-Involving-Movement"? 13 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: BusinessEntity Individual: ?i Types: authorityKind value LocalAuthority Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "authorityKind" to the object "LocalAuthority". Question: Is this class "(authorityKind value LocalAuthority)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "BusinessEntity"? 14 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: DayOfWeek Individual: ?i Types: hasNext value Friday Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasNext" to the object "Friday". Question: Is this class "(hasNext value Friday)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "DayOfWeek"? 15 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Event Individual: ?i Types: hasEventType value http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/eventType#com Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasEventType" to the object "com". Question: Is this class "(hasEventType value com)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Event"? 16 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Hardware Individual: ?i Types: hasHardwareType value http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/hardwareType#mem Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "hasHardwareType" to the object "mem". Question: Is this class "(hasHardwareType value mem)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Hardware"? 17 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Item Individual: ?i Types: isStoredOn value web Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "isStoredOn" to the object "web". Question: Is this class "(isStoredOn value web)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Item"? 18 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Contract Individual: ?i Types: kind value ArchitecturalServices Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "kind" to the object "ArchitecturalServices". Question: Is this class "(kind value ArchitecturalServices)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Contract"? 19 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: Person Individual: ?i Types: trainerClub some Thing Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "trainerClub" to at least one object. Question: Is this class "(trainerClub some Thing)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "Person"? 20 OWL (Manchester syntax): Individual: ?i Types: area Individual: ?i Types: isSuccessorOf value Republic_of_Moldova Explanation: ?i is an instance of the class that includes all objects which are in the relationship "isSuccessorOf" to the object "Republic_of_Moldova". Question: Is this class "(isSuccessorOf value Republic_of_Moldova)" a meaningful category for categorizing objects of the class "area"? A 2 (certainly) B 1 (perhaps) C 0 (borderline) D N (no judgment, since I don’t understand the example) E -1 (perhaps not) F -2 (certainly not)